March 27, 2009

The Silver Bullet in Sales

When I ran a marketing consultancy, I would periodically have to remind clients that no silver bullet exists in marketing. I assumed that marketing was more concerned about this silver bullet than sales and was surprised to find that Google lists 1.2 million results for "silver bullet sales" and just under 400,000 results for "silver bullet marketing."

Clearly many people are looking for that simple answer in sales too. Well, Virginia, there is no simple answer, although in doing this search I did find one company who suggests that "timing" is the silver bullet in sales. Timing certainly is important, but the definition of the "silver bullet" is something that cures all problems, and good timing won't make up for other inadequacies. I also found a sweet silver BMW Z4 convertible, but that's a different story.

Clients keep asking for that silver bullet. "Lee, what you're telling us is what we have been telling them to do (or think or say). We want something different, something better, something that will work right away. You know, a silver bullet."

The truth is that selling is hard. It's a mix of art and science. And building the right environment behind the sales person is hard. In a large organization (over $1B in revenues) it gets extremely complicated.

The typical $1B software company has 300-500 sales people and spends anywhere from $75M-$200M on their sales organization annually. There are a lot of moving parts in an organization of this size and these moving parts can create friction.

In small technology companies, the product managers and marketers are pretty closely aligned both with the sales team and the needs of their customers. Once a company reaches $1B in revenues, these product managers and marketers become somewhat detached from customer needs (unless they work hard at staying connected.) As a result, the marketing messages and assets tend to be pretty internally focused -- why our technology is better, etc.

Similarly, as the organization grows, sales operations tends to increasingly focus on the internal mechanisms of ensuring that forecasts and quotas and proposals and contracts and everything else gets delivered properly. What gets lost is the connection between all of these functions and processes and the concerns of the buyer.

Now the language of the sales person -- the conversations that they are holding with prospects and clients -- starts to decay. It starts to get stale and less effective. Good sales people instinctively sense this and adapt. But good sales people represent 10-20% of your sales organization.

It's the rest of the sales organization that's left hanging. They're still carrying on the 2006 or 2007 conversations about architecture or single sign-on or federated identity management or server clouds. And these conversations are falling on the deaf ears of 2009 era customers most concerned about capital preservation and making it past the next layoff and improving departmental performance this quarter!

Improved sales productivity...and higher customer satisfaction...and higher contribution margin...are all attainable. With no silver bullet available, we need to focus on ensuring that each and every sales professional is holding the right conversation with their prospects and customers.

In some cases, that means handholding a customer who will not spend a dime with you for 18 months. In other cases, it means pushing a customer to consider the cost and risk of not undertaking a specific project.

In this new economic climate, high performing organizations are questioning all of their assumptions. We can assume that only a few things that have worked in the past will continue to work in the future. One of those things is proper attention to sales methodology, sales enablement and sales management. This triumvirate, along with good customer intelligence and good people, will ensure continued selling success.

The details will be different, but the core processes are sound. By the way, most companies still struggle with these core processes. IDC found in a recent survey that just over half of all tech companies have a single consistent sales methodology.

So if you're looking for the silver bullet in sales, look inside. Are your core processes sound? Do you have a single consistent sales methodology? How is your sales enablement? Are your sales managers spending their time coaching reps or filling out reports?

Higher sales productivity is possible. It takes hard work and attention to process detail. Then it takes leadership to inspire your sales people to really connect with prospects and customers in ways they never have before.

March 20, 2009

If the team isn't playing together, it's the fault of the coach


My son and I attended a Boston Bruins - LA Kings ice hockey game yesterday evening. As a former player and coach, I recognized the source of the Bruin's malaise -- they were not playing as a team, but rather as a group of individuals who just happened to inhabit the same patch of ice.

The Bruins blew an early 2-0 lead over the Kings and the Bruins' goalie was peppered with some 30+ shots over the course of the game, double the number of shots taken by the Bruins. The Bruins' forwards didn't pass to one another and the defense let too many opposing players stay in front of the Bruins' goal for too long.

So what's going on here and why is this relevant to the science of selling?

The Bruins did not act as a coordinated unit on the ice and their results showed it. Only once during the game did I observe a Bruins play that appeared to have been rehearsed. The Kings, on the other hand, worked as a unit, got many more shots on goal, and ended up winning the game. One of the Kings' players accounted for two assists. Clearly he had been practicing plays with his teammates!

Selling is much the same. Many sales people do not practice their craft. They do not follow the same steps for each opportunity, instead "winging" it each time. Their sales results will reflect this lack of preparation, and their interaction with their sales team members frequently reflects a lack of preparation.

It's not the fault of the player or sales person, but rather the fault of the coach. It is the coach who decides what drills the players or sales people will use in practice, what muscle memory they will build. A "well-oiled" team, one which works together flawlessly, gets that way by many hours of practice.

The first line sales manager is the sales rep's coach. It is the responsibility of the first line sales manager to work with his or her team practicing the selling motions, helping them to prepare for client engagements, and ensuring that reps, sales engineers and other specialists each understand the role to play in a given sales situation.

There's plenty of room for improvement. IDC finds that over half of all sales people are either somewhat or completely unprepared for individual sales calls. Unfortunately, most sales organizations don't understand the role of the first line sales manager or how to hire, retain and support them, and as a result, sales people will continue to perform below par.

IDC can't help the Bruins play better. That's not our chosen battle ground. IDC can, however, help sales organizations to develop better sales managers and to find higher sales productivity. The IDC First Line Sales Manager presentation, below, provides some highlights on our recent best practice research on this critical sales organization role.

A full research document outlining our findings and recommendations will be available to clients shortly.